PROS: rigid, clean design, fully waterproof (IP55)
CONS: No bad PE protection detection (dangerous), no IEC 61851-1 norm (even printed at data plate)
- ❗ Security
- ⭐⭐⭐ Quality
- ⭐⭐⭐ Functionality
- ⭐⭐ Value for money
PROS: rigid, clean design, fully waterproof (IP55)
CONS: No bad PE protection detection (dangerous), no IEC 61851-1 norm (even printed at data plate)
PROS: control of power with RFID.
CONS: No bad PE protection detection (dangerous!), thin circuit board & bad design of PE line (risk of fire or burn), IP54 (moderate liquid ingress protection). No seal inside the plug.
PROS: silver-coated contacts
CONS: No bad PE protection detection (dangerous!), IP44 (moderate liquid ingress protection). Bad quality of input cable (PE, thin, cracks when cold), no seal in car side plug.
⭐ Security
⭐⭐⭐ Quality
⭐⭐ Functionality
⭐ Value for money
PROS: silver-coated contacts, IP54, good overall quality
CONS: No bad PE protection detection, no Stop button, no breaker.
⭐ Security
⭐⭐⭐ Quality
⭐⭐⭐ Functionality
⭐⭐ Value for money
PROS: PE protection, 3P or single-phase, long cable (10m), silver-coated contacts, variable connectors
CONS: IP44 (low liquid ingress protection)
⭐⭐⭐ Security
⭐⭐⭐⭐ Quality
⭐⭐⭐ Functionality
⭐⭐⭐ Value for money
CONS: bad No PE protection detection (dangerous!), IP44 (low liquid ingress protection)
6% slower, than declared (Real results: 2,2kW 9,4A)
PROS: Long cable (10m), silver-coated contacts, seal in the plug
⭐ Security
⭐⭐⭐⭐ Quality
⭐⭐ Functionality
⭐ Value for money